Once upon a time, it used to be you couldn’t trust early Twitter reviews. When “certified fresh” means not actually certified… Yep, Rotten Tomatoes is broken. That designation is a major tool for hype the fact that WW84 got this honor generated headlines at top geek culture sites, and Warner Bros splashed the graphic all over TV spots: It even slapped its “Certified Fresh” label on it - an assurance that so many positive reviews were in, the score could never dip into the “rotten” threshold. Nevertheless, Rotten Tomatoes still told us it was awesome. Wonder Woman 1984 is such a catastrophe, it couldn’t even coast on the goodwill of its predecessor, which is something a lot of terrible sequels do (see: Pirates of the Caribbean and Indiana Jones: Why Is There a Spaceship In This Movie). Wonder Woman 1984 sucks so bad it flopped in China, a country that has salvaged more than one piece of Hollywood garbage. To say anything different is anti-science. It’s simply a fact that Wonder Woman 1984 sucks. We’re getting trolled, we’re being played for suckers, and Rotten Tomatoes is allowing it. There’s something very wrong at Rotten Tomatoes when we’re not allowed to learn the truth of how truly bad a movie is until after it’s been released. Over at Metacritic, the audience score currently sits at just a 3.9 out of ten based on 1563 user ratings. In fact, things got so bad that, for a time, Wonder Woman 1984 dipped into “rotten” territory with a 59 percent rating.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |